ID# 103.1
From: L.K.Chen ([email protected]) - 12 Feb 1999
Skyscrapers as built today seem
to have reached a 'height limit'.
Many super tall buildings are going
up all over the world, especially in
Asia, but none of these substantially
exceed the height of the previous
world's tallest building.
We know that this is not due to
structural reasons, so why is
there this 'limit'?
-
ID# 103.2 (reply to #103.1) - 12 Feb 1999
Don't know much about the issue or the "true" reasons, but the tallest
ones built and immediately planned are indeed around the 450-meter mark.
I haven't followed the subject of the Height Race, in fact, at all, but
there have been rumours about Mahareshi Mahesh Yogi (of The Beatles fame
;^)) planning a building in India reaching the height of 666 m. Talk about
meditating high...
The reasons for the "modest" heights may be, again, economical. Although
the much greater heights are possible to achieve, the cost of structurally
strengthening the whole building especially against the force of wind can
exceed the immediate benefit of the upper floors -- especially if the tower
is tapering and the rentable floor area diminishes upwards. The possibility
of earthquakes in certain parts of Asia (where the new behemoths would most
likely rise) doesn't make the task any easier.
It is also possible that the tower doesn't get enough tenants and the
developer thus income to pay for the cost of construction, not to mention
operation and maintenance, of the building. Otherwise it's dumping time...
But if there's enough will, the new breed of super-tall structures will
most definitely rise. ED